| | | | | | |

Core i7-11700K vs Xeon E5-2698 v3


Description
The i7-11700K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the E5-2698 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700K gets a score of 742.2 k points while the E5-2698 v3 gets 1023.7 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2698 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-11700K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0671
306f2
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/32
TDP
125 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
16x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
40960 kB
Date
March 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
99.57k points
39.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
742.15k points
1023.68k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700K
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
36.24k
20.85k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
28.87k
10.77k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.76k
4.66k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.7k
3.02k (x0.14)
TOTAL
99.57k
39.29k (x0.39)

Multithread

i7-11700K

E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
315.15k
533.68k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
303.07k
328.47k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.09k
137.01k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
24.52k (x1.91)
TOTAL
742.15k
1023.68k (x1.38)

Performance/W
i7-11700K
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2521 points/W
3953 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2425 points/W
2433 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
889 points/W
1015 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
182 points/W
TOTAL
5937 points/W
7583 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11700K
E5-2698 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
7247 points/GHz
5791 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5775 points/GHz
2991 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2551 points/GHz
1294 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4341 points/GHz
838 points/GHz
TOTAL
19914 points/GHz
10914 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4