Core i7-11700K vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
The i7-11700K is based on Rocket Lake architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700K gets a score of 742.2 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700K is 1.6 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11700K gets a score of 742.2 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700K is 1.6 times faster than the 6900HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0671
a40f41
Core
Rocket Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2021
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
99.57k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
742.15k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11700K
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
36.24k
24.35k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
28.87k
26.85k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.76k
11.82k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.7k
24.18k (x1.11)
TOTAL
99.57k
87.21k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-11700K
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
315.15k
152.84k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
303.07k
208.12k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111.09k
88.84k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.85k
12.57k (x0.98)
TOTAL
742.15k
462.36k (x0.62)
Performance/W
i7-11700K
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2521 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2425 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
889 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
5937 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11700K
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7247 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5775 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2551 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4341 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
19914 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4