Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 6900HX is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 198.1 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 198.1 k points while the 6900HX gets 462.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 6900HX is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a40f41
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.44k points
87.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.11k points
462.36k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
24.35k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.39k
26.85k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.92k
11.82k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.41k
24.18k (x2.88)
TOTAL
61.44k
87.21k (x1.42)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
77.86k
152.84k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
81.18k
208.12k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.69k
88.84k (x3.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.39k
12.57k (x1.1)
TOTAL
198.11k
462.36k (x2.33)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2781 points/W
3396 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2899 points/W
4625 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
7075 points/W
10275 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
6900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4834 points/GHz
4969 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4551 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1899 points/GHz
2413 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1789 points/GHz
4935 points/GHz
TOTAL
13073 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4