Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 7 3700U
Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3700U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 198.1 k points while the 3700U gets 157.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 198.1 k points while the 3700U gets 157.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 3700U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f81
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.44k points
38.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.11k points
157.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
11.37k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
21.39k
19.79k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.92k
4.28k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.41k
3.3k (x0.39)
TOTAL
61.44k
38.75k (x0.63)
Multithread
i7-1165G7
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.86k
46.27k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
81.18k
85.35k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.69k
21.83k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.39k
3.75k (x0.33)
TOTAL
198.11k
157.2k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-1165G7
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
2781 points/W
3085 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2899 points/W
5690 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/W
1455 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
250 points/W
TOTAL
7075 points/W
10480 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
3700U
Test#1 (Integers)
4834 points/GHz
2842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4551 points/GHz
4949 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1899 points/GHz
1070 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1789 points/GHz
826 points/GHz
TOTAL
13073 points/GHz
9687 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4