| | | | | | |

Core i7-1165G7 vs Ryzen 5 7530U


Description
The i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 7530U is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1165G7 gets a score of 198.1 k points while the 7530U gets 171.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake-UP3
Barcelo-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
61.44k points
31.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.11k points
171.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1165G7
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.72k
8.81k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
21.39k
10.18k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.92k
4.31k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.41k
8.66k (x1.03)
TOTAL
61.44k
31.96k (x0.52)

Multithread

i7-1165G7

7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
77.86k
55.98k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
81.18k
76k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.69k
34.38k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.39k
5.04k (x0.44)
TOTAL
198.11k
171.39k (x0.87)

Performance/W
i7-1165G7
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
2781 points/W
3732 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2899 points/W
5066 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
989 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
7075 points/W
11426 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1165G7
7530U
Test#1 (Integers)
4834 points/GHz
1957 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4551 points/GHz
2262 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1899 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1789 points/GHz
1925 points/GHz
TOTAL
13073 points/GHz
7103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4