| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
343.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
20.99k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
11.9k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
4.72k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
3.75k (x0.37)
TOTAL
76.93k
41.36k (x0.54)

Multithread

i7-11370H

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
172.62k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
110.03k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
44.06k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
16.93k (x2.52)
TOTAL
295.92k
343.64k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4