| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.2 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
1241.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
29.53k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
22.59k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.99k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
10.22k (x1.01)
TOTAL
76.93k
68.33k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
587.06k (x4.84)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
496.41k (x3.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
134.66k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
22.99k (x3.42)
TOTAL
295.92k
1241.12k (x4.19)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4