| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i9-10940X


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 3.7 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/28
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
1088.11k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
29.75k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
27.44k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.81k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
9.05k (x0.89)
TOTAL
76.93k
72.04k (x0.94)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
485.37k (x4)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
472.7k (x3.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
113.09k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
16.95k (x2.52)
TOTAL
295.92k
1088.11k (x3.68)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
6595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4