Core i7-11370H vs i7-7700
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
906e9
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
257.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
26.7k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
23.7k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.46k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
11.48k (x1.13)
TOTAL
76.93k
67.33k (x0.88)
Multithread
i7-11370H
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
115.97k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
108.43k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
26.28k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.85k (x1.02)
TOTAL
295.92k
257.52k (x0.87)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
1668 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
3962 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6356 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
2733 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
16032 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4