| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i5-9600KF


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ec
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
371.08k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
30.52k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
26.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
6.41k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
13.87k (x1.37)
TOTAL
76.93k
77.34k (x1.01)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
174.66k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
154.06k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
34.11k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
8.24k (x1.22)
TOTAL
295.92k
371.08k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4