Core i7-11370H vs i5-8600
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-8600 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-8600 gets 317.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-8600 gets 317.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8600 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2021
March 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
70.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
317.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
28.14k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
24.71k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.51k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
11.95k (x1.18)
TOTAL
76.93k
70.3k (x0.91)
Multithread
i7-11370H
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
159.4k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
126.93k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
26.76k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
4.4k (x0.65)
TOTAL
295.92k
317.49k (x1.07)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
1953 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
412 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
4884 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i5-8600
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6543 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5746 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1281 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
16350 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4