Core i7-11370H vs i5-8400H
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-8400H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-8400H gets 195.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8400H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-8400H gets 195.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8400H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
67.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
195.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i5-8400H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
26.51k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
23.61k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.17k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
11.76k (x1.16)
TOTAL
76.93k
67.06k (x0.87)
Multithread
i7-11370H
i5-8400H
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
85.52k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
84.4k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
19.19k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.83k (x1.02)
TOTAL
295.92k
195.94k (x0.66)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
i5-8400H
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
1875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
4354 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i5-8400H
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6313 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
2800 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
15967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4