| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i5-4460


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-4460 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-4460 gets 141.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 2.1 times faster than the i5-4460. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
306c3
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
39.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
141.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
19.89k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
10.84k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
4.47k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
4.42k (x0.44)
TOTAL
76.93k
39.63k (x0.52)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
75.48k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
42.58k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
16.44k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.7k (x1)
TOTAL
295.92k
141.2k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
899 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
507 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
196 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
80 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
1681 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i5-4460
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
5851 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
3189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
1299 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
11655 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4