| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.9 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a70f41
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Phoenix
Architecture
Tiger Lake
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
553.41k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
32.74k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
27.35k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
14.23k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
27.41k (x2.7)
TOTAL
76.93k
101.73k (x1.32)

Multithread

i7-11370H

Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
236.69k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
202.63k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
102.8k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
11.28k (x1.68)
TOTAL
295.92k
553.41k (x1.87)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
18447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4