Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5700X3D is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 5700X3D gets 599.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 2 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 5700X3D gets 599.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5700X3D is 2 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a20f12
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
98304 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
77.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
599.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
21.08k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
23.19k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
10.51k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
22.82k (x2.25)
TOTAL
76.93k
77.6k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-11370H
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
167.11k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
218.19k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
100.5k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
113.87k (x16.92)
TOTAL
295.92k
599.67k (x2.03)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1592 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
2078 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
957 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
1084 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
5711 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
5700X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5656 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2564 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
5567 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
18926 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4