Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.4 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.4 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2021
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
16.66k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
26.01k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
9.31k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
9.15k (x0.9)
TOTAL
76.93k
61.12k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-11370H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
144.48k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
192.46k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
83.17k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
7.51k (x1.12)
TOTAL
295.92k
427.61k (x1.45)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4