Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f82
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
431.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
15.34k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
25.75k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
5.79k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
17.95k (x1.77)
TOTAL
76.93k
64.83k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-11370H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
123.07k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
239.3k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
60.6k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
8.18k (x1.22)
TOTAL
295.92k
431.14k (x1.46)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4