Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen 5 5625U
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a50f00
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
18.57k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
22.03k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
9.55k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
20.5k (x2.02)
TOTAL
76.93k
70.65k (x0.92)
Multithread
i7-11370H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
92.92k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
128.4k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
54.82k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
5.13k (x0.76)
TOTAL
295.92k
281.26k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4