Core i7-11370H vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11370H is 1.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
800f11
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2021
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
13.67k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
22.28k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
4.99k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
15.22k (x1.5)
TOTAL
76.93k
56.16k (x0.73)
Multithread
i7-11370H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
81.03k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
145.84k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
39.14k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.79k (x1.01)
TOTAL
295.92k
272.8k (x0.92)
Performance/W
i7-11370H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4