| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i9-12900HK


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i9-12900HK is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i9-12900HK gets 622.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-12900HK is 2.1 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906a3
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/20
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
68.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
622.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
30.51k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
18.67k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
9.69k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
9.55k (x0.94)
TOTAL
76.93k
68.43k (x0.89)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
273.58k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
228.21k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
111.89k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
9.15k (x1.36)
TOTAL
295.92k
622.83k (x2.1)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
6080 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
5071 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
2486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
13841 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i9-12900HK
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
3734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
1938 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
1911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
13686 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4