| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i5-12400F


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
90675
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
399.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
33.85k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
20.33k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
10.51k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
11.77k (x1.16)
TOTAL
76.93k
76.46k (x0.99)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
174.21k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
141.31k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
64.86k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
19.01k (x2.82)
TOTAL
295.92k
399.39k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4