| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i9-11900H


Description
Both models i7-11370H and i9-11900H are based on Tiger Lake architecture.

It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i9-11900H gets 584.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-11900H is 2 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806d1
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2021
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
89.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
584.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
33.38k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
27.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
11.69k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
17k (x1.68)
TOTAL
76.93k
89.19k (x1.16)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
249.83k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
237.26k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
84.18k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
13.2k (x1.96)
TOTAL
295.92k
584.47k (x1.98)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
5552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
5272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
1871 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
293 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
12988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i9-11900H
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6812 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
3469 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
18202 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4