| | | | | | |

Core i7-11370H vs i7-11700F


Description
The i7-11370H is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11370H gets a score of 295.9 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.7 times faster than the i7-11370H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake H35
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
76.93k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
295.92k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11370H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.87k
32.55k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
26.93k
26.95k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.99k
10.76k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.14k
19.32k (x1.91)
TOTAL
76.93k
89.58k (x1.16)

Multithread

i7-11370H

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
121.33k
232.06k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
125.74k
203.56k (x1.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
42.12k
72.89k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
3.81k (x0.57)
TOTAL
295.92k
512.32k (x1.73)

Performance/W
i7-11370H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3466 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3593 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
192 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
8455 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11370H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6223 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5611 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2080 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2113 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
16028 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4