Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
406f1
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
237.83k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
12.16k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
11.82k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
3.02k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
2.4k (x0.33)
TOTAL
56.25k
29.39k (x0.52)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
103.77k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
102.28k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
26.13k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
5.65k (x1.85)
TOTAL
241.03k
237.83k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4