Core i3-1125G4 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
50657
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2020
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
12.92k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
10.97k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
2.54k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
5.09k (x0.69)
TOTAL
56.25k
31.52k (x0.56)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
103.33k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
87.67k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
20.1k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
4.91k (x1.61)
TOTAL
241.03k
216.02k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4