Core i3-1125G4 vs i7-8750H
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1 times faster than the i7-8750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
906ea
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
231.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
22.36k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
19.33k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
4.4k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
7.32k (x0.99)
TOTAL
56.25k
53.41k (x0.95)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
103.82k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
100.47k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
23.81k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
3.8k (x1.25)
TOTAL
241.03k
231.9k (x0.96)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
2307 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
2233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
529 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
5153 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
5454 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1073 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
1786 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
13027 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4