Core i3-1125G4 vs i7-5960X
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-5960X is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i7-5960X gets 294.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5960X is 1.2 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
306f2
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
13.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
294.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
6.6k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
3.8k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
1.41k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
1.34k (x0.18)
TOTAL
56.25k
13.16k (x0.23)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
146.65k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
100.72k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
34.09k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
12.83k (x4.21)
TOTAL
241.03k
294.29k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1047 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
719 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
243 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
2102 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i7-5960X
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
1887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
1086 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
3759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4