Core i3-1125G4 vs i7-4790K
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-4790K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i7-4790K gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i7-4790K gets 212.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4790K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
306c3
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
88 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
52.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
212.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
26.22k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
14.81k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
5.98k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
5.59k (x0.76)
TOTAL
56.25k
52.6k (x0.94)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
106.98k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
68.77k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
27.19k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
9.59k (x3.15)
TOTAL
241.03k
212.53k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
2415 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i7-4790K
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
5960 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
3366 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1359 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
1270 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
11954 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4