| | | | | | |

Core i3-1125G4 vs i5-10500T


Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0653
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
302.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
25.16k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
22.28k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
5.18k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
11.97k (x1.62)
TOTAL
56.25k
64.6k (x1.15)

Multithread

i3-1125G4

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
144.86k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
120.98k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
32.55k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
3.73k (x1.23)
TOTAL
241.03k
302.13k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4