Core i3-1125G4 vs i5-10300H
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a0652
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
27.14k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
24.75k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
5.73k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
11.84k (x1.61)
TOTAL
56.25k
69.47k (x1.23)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
105.77k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
107.47k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
24.82k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
8.02k (x2.63)
TOTAL
241.03k
246.07k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4