Core i3-1125G4 vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
506e8
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
22.46k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
20.45k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
4.75k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
10.39k (x1.41)
TOTAL
56.25k
58.05k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
92.69k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
90.45k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
22.02k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
5.75k (x1.89)
TOTAL
241.03k
210.91k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W