Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 7 4800U
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 4800U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
860f01
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Renoir
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
57.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
356.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
16.53k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
24.67k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
9.04k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
7.68k (x1.04)
TOTAL
56.25k
57.92k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
121.96k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
162.82k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
68.25k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
3.79k (x1.24)
TOTAL
241.03k
356.81k (x1.48)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
8131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
10854 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
4550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
252 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
23788 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
3936 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
2153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
13790 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4