Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 3700X gets 482.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 2 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 3700X gets 482.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 2 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
870f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Matisse
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
74.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
482.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
16.77k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
26.3k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
8.81k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
22.53k (x3.06)
TOTAL
56.25k
74.41k (x1.32)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
165.4k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
208.96k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
92.87k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
14.87k (x4.88)
TOTAL
241.03k
482.11k (x2)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
2545 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
3215 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
229 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
7417 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
2002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
5120 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
16911 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4