Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 5 5600
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
a20f12
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
429.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
22.73k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
24.59k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
11.44k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
25.03k (x3.4)
TOTAL
56.25k
83.79k (x1.49)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
134.28k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
178.56k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
78.16k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
38.26k (x12.55)
TOTAL
241.03k
429.25k (x1.78)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4