Core i3-1125G4 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 3.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 3.4 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
810f10
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
10.73k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
18.15k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
3.99k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
3.89k (x0.53)
TOTAL
56.25k
36.77k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
20.11k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
36.87k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
10.74k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
3.31k (x1.08)
TOTAL
241.03k
71.02k (x0.29)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4