Core i3-1125G4 vs A12 9800
Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 2.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 2.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806c1
660f51
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
September 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
13.42k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
17.61k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
3.77k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
3.06k (x0.41)
TOTAL
56.25k
37.86k (x0.67)
Multithread
i3-1125G4
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
40.46k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
43.18k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
12.78k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
4.37k (x1.43)
TOTAL
241.03k
100.79k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i3-1125G4
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4