| | | | | | |

Core i3-1125G4 vs i3-1215U


Description
The i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
906a4
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
185.6k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
37.56k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
21.13k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
11.35k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
10.31k (x1.4)
TOTAL
56.25k
80.34k (x1.43)

Multithread

i3-1125G4

i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
73.97k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
72.37k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
29.61k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
9.65k (x3.17)
TOTAL
241.03k
185.6k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
12374 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4