| | | | | | |

Core i3-1125G4 vs i3-1115G4


Description
Both models i3-1125G4 and i3-1115G4 are based on Tiger Lake architecture.

It’s the 11th generation of Core CPUs and it’s manufactured in the 10nm SuperFin process.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-1125G4 gets a score of 241 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1125G4 is 1.7 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806c1
806c1
Core
Tiger Lake UP3
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1449
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x48 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x1280 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.25k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
241.03k points
137.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-1125G4
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.63k
24.25k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
21.63k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.89k
9.09k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.37k
7.23k (x0.98)
TOTAL
56.25k
62.19k (x1.11)

Multithread

i3-1125G4

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
103.42k
56.9k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
102.39k
55.68k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.17k
19.29k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.05k
6.09k (x2)
TOTAL
241.03k
137.96k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i3-1125G4
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3657 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1149 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
109 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
8608 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-1125G4
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6116 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4691 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2403 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1992 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
15203 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4