| | | | | | |

Result in mode FPU

Submitted by krampak


March 19th 2020 at 15:20

from Windows 10 (Redstone 5 - 1809) [10.0.17763.557]
 
Monothread
Multithread [4 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
864 points
2750 points (x 3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
1391 points
4405 points (x 3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1228 points
3806 points (x 3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
816 points
1009 points (x 1.2)
TOTAL
4299 points
11970 points (x 2.8)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1693 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Atom(TM) x5-Z8350 CPU @ 1.44GHz
CPUID
406c4
Core
Cherry Trail
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.44 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.72 GHz
Socket
BGA592
Cores/Threads
4/4
TDP
2 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
February 2016
Mean monothread perf.
6.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.99k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
American Megatrends Inc.
BIOS version
DF-BI-7-S70CR200-CC34E-004-D [03/30/2018]

Specs
Official name
Default string Default string Default string
Motherboard
AMI Corporation Cherry Trail CR
Revision
Default string
Architecture
Socket
BGA 592
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Total RAM
2 GB
Bus width
8 bits
Frequency
1600 MHz
Type
DDR3
Form factor
DIMM

Slot 0: Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8
P/N
M471B5673FH0-CF8
Official brand
80CE
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
1066 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
Module
PC3-8500
Voltage
1,5 V
Timings
7-10
Kit
1 x 2048 MB
ECC
no
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
726.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
727.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
728.cobito
Intel Celeron D 331
6851
729.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
730.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
731.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
732.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
733.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
734.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
735.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
736.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
737.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
738.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
739.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
740.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
741.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013
742.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
743.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
744.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
745.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
746.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
4299
This one
747.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822
748.*
Intel Atom N270
3419
749.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
2983
750.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
2877
751.*
Intel Atom Z520
1881
752.cobito
Intel Mobile Pentium II PE 333
797
753.cobito
Intel i486DX4 75
33
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
694.kynes
Intel Pentium T3400
14908
695.*
Intel Celeron N2840
14684
696.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
14184
697.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
14159
698.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
699.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
700.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
701.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
702.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
703.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363
704.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13336
705.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
13152
706.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
13080
707.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
12987
708.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
12907
709.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
12904
710.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
12895
711.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
12887
712.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
12874
713.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
12037
714.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
11970
This one
715.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
11834
716.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
717.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10649
718.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
719.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
720.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
721.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
722.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
723.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
724.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
725.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
726.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
727.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
728.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
729.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
730.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
731.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
732.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
733.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
734.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4