| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


April 05th 2023 at 00:42

from Windows 10 (22H2) [10.0.19045.2788]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2256 points
4189 points (x 1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
4933 points
9162 points (x 1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1912 points
3523 points (x 1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1033 points
1258 points (x 1.2)
TOTAL
10134 points
18132 points (x 1.8)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1997 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6400 @ 2.00GHz
CPUID
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
Cores/Threads
2/2
TDP
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Acer
BIOS version
V1.20 [03/16/2010]

Specs
Official name
Acer Aspire 8930 V1.20
Motherboard
Acer Aspire 8930
Revision
PSMBOU-1234567
Architecture
Socket
PGA 478
Memory FF
SODIMM
Memory type
DDR2
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#0
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Slot#1
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Total RAM
4 GB
Bus width
bits
Frequency
800 MHz
Type
Other
Form factor
SODIMM

Slots 0, 1: Unknown N/A
P/N
000000000000000000000000000000000000
Official brand
0000000000000000
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Size
2048 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
781.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
11337
782.krampak
Intel Xeon E5504
11201
783.*
AMD A6 7310
11170
784.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
11151
785.*
Intel Pentium N3540
11127
786.*
Intel Core i5-450M
11094
787.NakedCOOL
AMD Athlon II 170u
11027
788.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
10903
789.cobito
Intel Pentium N3540
10805
790.krampak
Intel Xeon E5506
10774
791.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10726
792.*
Intel Pentium J2900
10645
793.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10583
794.*
Intel Xeon X5365
10500
795.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
10445
796.*
Intel Pentium N3530
10441
797.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10344
798.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
10332
799.*
Intel Celeron N2840
10272
800.*
Intel Celeron N3060
10147
801.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
10134
This one
802.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
10046
803.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
9959
804.*
Intel Celeron J1900
9783
805.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9766
806.Namiga
AMD Athlon 5350
9725
807.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
9567
808.krampak
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v5
9522
809.desvest
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
9443
810.*
Intel Celeron N3150
9345
811.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9208
812.cobito
Intel Celeron N3150
9175
813.*
Intel Celeron T3000
9156
814.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
9055
815.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
8924
816.krampak
Intel Pentium D 950
8809
817.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
8770
818.Yorus
Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
8728
819.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
8338
820.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
8306
821.Yorus
AMD Athlon 5150 APU
8259

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
788.mdigerat
Intel Core P9400
23315
789.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500
23050
790.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
22949
791.*
Intel Pentium P6200
22910
792.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
22518
793.Rober García
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
22360
794.krampak
Intel Xeon E5502
22279
795.jos_shua
Intel Pentium E5200 (M0)
22021
796.*
Intel Core i3-2367M
21517
797.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
21502
798.*
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
20994
799.PEDRO CEPEDA
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
20833
800.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
20628
801.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
20580
802.*
Intel Core i3-3240
20503
803.*
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700
19774
804.Namiga
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
19076
805.Yorus
Intel Celeron N2840
18897
806.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18237
807.*
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
18191
808.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
18132
This one
809.danipro23
AMD Athlon II M300
17727
810.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17293
811.cobito
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
17146
812.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
17038
813.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
16985
814.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
16871
815.*
AMD A4 3310MX
16499
816.desvest
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
15746
817.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
15447
818.kynes
Intel Pentium T3400
14908
819.*
Intel Celeron N2840
14684
820.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
14184
821.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
14159
822.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
14076
823.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
14027
824.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
13944
825.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
13822
826.*
Intel Celeron T3000
13792
827.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
13488
828.*
Intel Celeron N3060
13363

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4