| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted by Namiga


February 27th 2020 at 09:29

from Windows 10 (Redstone 1 - 1607) [10.0.14393]
 
Monothread
Multithread [1 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
2303 points
0 points (x 0.0)
Test#2 (FP)
2069 points
0 points (x 0.0)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2072 points
0 points (x 0.0)
Test#1 (Memory)
900 points
0 points (x 0.0)
TOTAL
7344 points
0 points (x 0.0)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
2021 MHz

Specs
Official name
Genuine Intel(R) CPU 575 @ 2.00GHz
CPUID
6fd
Core
Meron
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Cores/Threads
1/1
TDP
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
7.28k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
American Megatrends Inc.
BIOS version
PBT32A0.P08 [11/21/2008]

Specs
Official name
Packard Bell BV EasyNote_BG35-V-100SP LX.B400Y.002
Motherboard
Packard Bell BV T32A
Revision
1.0
Architecture
Socket
PGA 478
          
Memory

Testing details
Slot#1
Unknown N/A (2048 MB)
Total RAM
2 GB
Bus width
64 bits
Frequency
667 MHz
Type
DDR2
Form factor
SODIMM

Slot 1: Unknown N/A
P/N
SODIMM000
Official brand
Mfg 0
Type
Form factor
SODIMM
Stock frequency
666 MHz
Size
2048 MB per module
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
807.kynes
Intel Pentium T3400
8049
808.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
7955
809.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 519K
7948
810.cobito
Intel Celeron D 347
7934
811.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
7925
812.cobito
Intel Celeron D 346
7796
813.krampak
Intel Pentium D 925
7696
814.*
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7672
815.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2180
7656
816.kynes
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
7647
817.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 515J
7626
818.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
7561
819.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
7484
820.cobito
Intel Celeron D 341
7481
821.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
7469
822.cobito
Intel Pentium D 820
7464
823.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
7464
824.cobito
Intel Pentium D 915
7454
825.krampak
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
7385
826.*
AMD A4 5000
7376
827.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
7344
This one
828.cobito
Intel Celeron D 335
7174
829.krampak
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
7060
830.Fassou
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100
7048
831.cobito
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300
7040
832.*
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
7037
833.*
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2160
7008
834.cobito
Intel Celeron D 331
6851
835.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
6744
836.*
AMD E1 2500
6645
837.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
838.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
839.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
840.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
841.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
842.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
843.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
844.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
845.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
846.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
847.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
823.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10649
824.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
825.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
826.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
827.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
828.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
829.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
830.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
831.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
832.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
833.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
834.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
835.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
836.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
837.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
838.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
839.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
840.cobito
Intel Atom Z520
3658
841.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
842.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844
843.Namiga
Intel Celeron M 575
0
This one
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Signatures and results

If you want customized signatures for your site, forum, community, etc, contact us. It's free!

Official style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Ranking style

signature
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4