| | | | | | |

Result in mode SSE

Submitted anonymously


August 31th 2020 at 02:38

from Windows 7 [6.1.7601]
 
Monothread
Multithread [2 threads]
Test#1 (Integers)
1088 points
1268 points (x 1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
834 points
1300 points (x 1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
873 points
1260 points (x 1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
305 points
444 points (x 1.5)
TOTAL
3100 points
4272 points (x 1.4)

Screenshot
hlbm
Markdown link:
vBulletin link:
Image link:
          
CPU

Testing details
Frequency (measured)
1607 MHz

Specs
Official name
Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz
CPUID
106c2
Core
Diamondville
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 437
Cores/Threads
1 /2
TDP
3 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
Release date
June 2008
Mean monothread perf.
3.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
4.43k points
          
Computer

Testing details
BIOS brand
Hewlett-Packard
BIOS version
308F0 Ver. F.05 [05/11/2009]

Specs
Official name
Hewlett-Packard Compaq Mini 110c-1000 03A8100000000000100300000
Motherboard
Hewlett-Packard 308F
Revision
KBC Version 02.09
Architecture
Socket
BGA 437
          
Performance

Monothread performance graphs
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graphs
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#2 (FP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Test#1 (Memory)
grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Monothread ranking
User
Model
Score
916.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2450
6599
917.cobito
Intel Celeron D 326
6538
918.*
AMD E2 Series 3800
6521
919.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
6512
920.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
6421
921.kwankahung
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
6282
922.cobito
Intel Celeron 420
6267
923.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
6262
924.*
Intel Celeron D 331
6195
925.Hin
Intel Core i3-370M
6106
926.Namiga
Intel Core i7-720QM
6013
927.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
5584
928.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
5281
929.*
AMD E-Series E-300
5224
930.*
AMD C Series C-60
5213
931.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
5101
932.*
Intel Atom N450
3858
933.cobito
Intel Atom N450
3822
934.*
Intel Atom N270
3419
935.*
Intel Atom N2600
3290
936.*
Intel Atom N270
3100
This one
937.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
2877
938.*
Intel Atom Z520
1881
939.cobito
Intel Mobile Pentium II PE 333
797
940.cobito
Intel i486DX4 75
33
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Multithread ranking
User
Model
Score
900.hAyO
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
10972
901.*
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500
10649
902.*
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
10260
903.Namiga
AMD E Series E-350
10048
904.krampak
AMD E Series E-450
9654
905.*
AMD E1 2500
9443
906.kynes
Intel Core Duo T2300
9380
907.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 630
9250
908.*
AMD C Series C-60
9216
909.cobito
AMD C Series C-60
9214
910.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
9168
911.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 531
9163
912.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 520
8671
913.cobito
Intel Pentium 4 HT 521
8600
914.*
Intel Core 2 Duo T5270
8309
915.*
AMD E-Series E-300
7268
916.*
Intel Atom N450
5664
917.cobito
Intel Atom N450
4972
918.*
Intel Atom N270
4477
919.*
Intel Atom N2600
4374
920.*
Intel Atom N270
4272
This one
921.Namiga
Intel Atom N450
3401
922.*
Intel Atom Z520
2844
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4