ARM M1 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The M1 is based on - architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M1 gets a score of 142.3 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the M1 is 5.6 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M1 gets a score of 142.3 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the M1 is 5.6 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
10676
Core
-
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
-
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
January 1900
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
41.44k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.32k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M1
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
9.46k
3k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
6.62k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
2.55k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
3.6k (x0.95)
TOTAL
41.44k
15.77k (x0.38)
Multithread
M1
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
34.73k
5.83k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
87.52k
12.64k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.74k
4.97k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
1.95k (x0.31)
TOTAL
142.32k
25.39k (x0.18)
Performance/W
M1
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)