| | | | | | |

ARM M1 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The M1 is based on - architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M1 gets a score of 142.3 k points while the 3200G gets 165.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the M1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f4a
810f81
Core
-
Picasso
Architecture
-
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
-
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
- W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
January 1900
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
41.44k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.32k points
168.69k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
M1
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
9.46k
14.3k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
21.69k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.76k
5.42k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.8k
6.6k (x1.74)
TOTAL
41.44k
48k (x1.16)

Multithread

M1

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
34.73k
55.45k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
87.52k
83.13k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.74k
20.76k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
6.58k (x1.04)
TOTAL
142.32k
165.91k (x1.17)

Performance/W
M1
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)