Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Xeon W3550
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the W3550 is based on .
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3550 is 2 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W3550 is 2 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
106a5
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Bloomfield
Architecture
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.55 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
-
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
8/8
4 /4
TDP
7 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
64 kB
Cache L2
- kB
256 kB
Cache L3
- kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2021
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
73.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
8.34k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
5.56k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
3.26k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
3.08k (x1.7)
TOTAL
16.53k
20.24k (x1.22)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
32.5k (x9.39)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
21.59k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
12.85k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
6.27k (x2.2)
TOTAL
37k
73.21k (x1.98)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4