Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Pentium P6200
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.6 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.6 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
20655
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
-
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
7 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
- kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2021
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
5.29k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
3.55k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
2.1k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.8k (x0.99)
TOTAL
16.53k
12.74k (x0.77)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
10.06k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
6.74k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
3.96k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
2.16k (x0.76)
TOTAL
37k
22.91k (x0.62)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4