Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Celeron N5105
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.7 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.7 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
906c0
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.55 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
-
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
7 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
- kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
9.83k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
9.74k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
3.65k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
3.88k (x2.14)
TOTAL
16.53k
27.1k (x1.64)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
25.04k (x7.23)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
24.7k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
9.29k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
5.06k (x1.78)
TOTAL
37k
64.09k (x1.73)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4