| | | | | | |

Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Celeron N4020


Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 1.5 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f4a
706a8
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.55 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
-
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
7 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
- kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
- kB
0 kB
Date
May 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
25.26k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
5.14k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
7.89k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
2.87k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.76k (x0.97)
TOTAL
16.53k
17.67k (x1.07)

Multithread

7c Gen 2

N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
7.46k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
11.61k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
4.27k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
1.91k (x0.67)
TOTAL
37k
25.26k (x0.68)

Performance/W
7c Gen 2
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
4211 points/W

Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4