| | | | | | |

Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Celeron N3450


Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.1 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f4a
506c9
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.55 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
-
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
7 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
- kB
kB
Date
May 2021
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
39.33k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
5.95k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
3.45k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
1.92k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
1.78k (x0.98)
TOTAL
16.53k
13.11k (x0.79)

Multithread

7c Gen 2

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
21.38k (x6.17)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
9.84k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
5.25k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
2.86k (x1)
TOTAL
37k
39.33k (x1.06)

Performance/W
7c Gen 2
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4