Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468) architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7c Gen 2 gets a score of 37 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.
Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the 7c Gen 2. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f4a
506e3
Core
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.55 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
-
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
7 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
- kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
- kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
- kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2021
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.53k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
37k points
49.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
7c Gen 2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
8.56k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
8.17k
12.25k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.67k
3.17k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.82k
3.35k (x1.84)
TOTAL
16.53k
27.33k (x1.65)
Multithread
7c Gen 2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.46k
16.42k (x4.74)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
23.61k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.09k
5.75k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
3.55k (x1.24)
TOTAL
37k
49.34k (x1.33)
Performance/W
7c Gen 2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
495 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1156 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
407 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
5286 points/W
1410 points/W
Performance/GHz
7c Gen 2
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1516 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3205 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1047 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
712 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
6481 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4